Edo devised his theory by initially gluing and taping marbles together studying spherical densest packing and geometry. He then bought neodymium spherical dipolar magnets and worked with those for several years. However he could only create the smaller elements with magnets. Larger atoms take time to create and one mistake and the unforgiving magnets will distort too much and one can more or less start again. Also to compare different elements would take thousands of magnets. When he came to the EU 2016 conference to give his presentation, he hoped to meet someone that would build a computer program to create atoms and overcome these practical problems.
James went to the EU 2016 conference hoping to find someone needing a computer program to demonstrate a Scientific theory. Preferably using 3D graphics, something James had always wanted to learn. James had just finished contract work 3 days before and was looking for his next project.
Edo and James met at the Grand Canyon right after the EU 2016 conference EU Geology. They were sitting on a curb waiting for a member of their party to show up. James asked Edwin a couple question about his theory and Edwin reached into his backpack and pulled out three notebooks he had created about the theory. It was apparent he had been working on it for years and this was no half-baked idea. Here were pages and pages of notes showing the Edo's structure of the nucleus determines the layout of the Periodic Table. The structure determines chemistry - as it should. Within minutes James decided this was not a chance meeting, it was providence that had led him to this moment. This was to become his next project.
James left the tour early and immediately began work on the "Atom Builder". A couple months later Edo came out to Colorado and lived with James for 1 1/2 months. This was a very unique and productive situation and allowed them to create, for virtually no cost and in a very short time, a complex program that would have been difficult and expensive to do in a conventional manner.
One of the coolest aspects of this theory is it doesn't require advanced mathematics and a PHD in physics to understand. The nucleus can be built using inexpensive magnets and the result can be help in your hand. An 8 year old can be taught in 5 minutes how to build the Oxygen atom. I still stare at the shapes and I've been building them for over a year now. This is real hands on Science.
I took chemistry in both High School and College. I have a pretty good understanding of basic Chemistry. But a year ago I couldn't tell you how many protons Oxygen has, or what the elements are in the second row of the periodic table. Now that I've built atoms using the magnets I can easily answer these questions and many more. I can see the atoms in my mind and can visualize how they grow and combine together to make molecules.
Atom Builder enhancements:
- Add additional protons (neutrons) to nuclets.
- Allow edo to color protons any color.
- Add wireframes to beryllium and boron.
- Make Boron 10 more like beryllium.
- Make Atom selector behave better.
- Add better instructions and descriptions.
- Fix memory leaks - reuse geometries and mesh's if possible.
The atomizer's current capabilities are:
- Atom builder
- Platonic solids
- Atom builder improvements
- Calculate volume to estimate densest packing ratio. This is of relevance for understanding energy ground states and the implications of E=MC2.
- Create 2D representation of an atom. Shows branches and growth possibilities in a simple tree diagram.
- Show theorized electron locations and behavior.
- Educational Tool
- That allows students to build and explore the atom and the properties of the elements.
- Add ability to show visually how elements transmute into other elements - alpha decay, beta decay, nuclear fission and fusion.
- Auto Builder
- Create computer algorithm that implements SAM's rules and automatically creates all possible elements and isotopes.
- Calculate the valence and spin for each atom created.
- 3D Periodic table
- Create a 3D version of the periodic table that is organized based on the branching nature and rules of SAM.
For each element show a popup with:
A description of the elements and its particularities in the structure, how it can be created, what is can be turned into (transmutation) etc.
Basic data: Z (P+e), group, standard valence, etc
2D representation (formula based on the 3D structure of the geometry.
3D atom viewer: a separate window with the actual 3D element that can be tuned to show multiple “things” colors, transparent, spheres, geometry, electrons etc.
- Show how outer electron position and behavior are determined by the nuclear structure.
- To extend the nuclear behavior to the level of chemistry by showing the creation of chemical compounds such as organic molecules and minerals.
If beta-decay also includes a proton decaying into a neutron and a positron, then how does your model incorporate positrons into the model?
Perhaps instead of having smaller things in orbit in a proton or electron, like is see in some models, your model could have electrons and positrons pressed into a spherical shape to make a proton.
There is no argument about the speed that fluctuates between psychical mediums, But for example, we assume that the speed of light near Alpha Centauri is the same as the speed of light here on Earth. what I'm saying is we just assuming it, we don't know about that right, do we?
The facts are that we cannot know what is going on everywhere in the universe, so we cannot determine that the speed of light (electromagnetic wave speed) is constant!
We can assume different possibilities, (just like we assuming that it is constant), what if light is emitted from someplace near us.
maybe it emitted from the center of the earth.
and maybe is emitted from life. maybe there is million more possibility?
maybe after you laugh for a few seconds you will maybe realize that this is not a completely unbelievable idea as it can dismiss some paradoxes in Quantum Physics.
The reason why I built the model is because, I just love to know everything I don't know yet. I don't think i am a smart person or anything like that, but I think all things must be simple in there core. The model I built: earlier i saw in my imagination the possibility, that it was possible to build a universe that consists of one thing, that disturbs itself, what we call a scalar wave.
I built the math by using Fractal Math and Dimensional Analysis. So I started like this, landscape of the universe on one side and some function on the other side of the equator, So:
Universe=(Z) Then I added dimensions to the vector Z then, (Z ^ K) or in Dimensional Analysis: Energy And in complex space it looks like a donuts if K is different from 0. Then I added the interference to the vector (Z ^ K) The disorder must come from what is already there, which means that the disorder must come from (Z ^ K) or in other words what (Z ^ K) is not! My solution was this: -(Z/Z^K) or in Dimensional Analysis Mass.
now we have a landscape of the universe=(Z^K)-(Z/Z^K) or in Dimensional Analysis E/M when you look at this geometry it is look like kind of donuts inside of a donuts. then i add the speed of light from the left side, because this universe need to be build only from one thing.
in Dimensional Analysis look like this: C^2=E/M or in fractal geometry look like so: f(z)=(Z^k)-(Z/Z^k)+(Z^k)-(Z/Z^k)+... the shape now looking like Plasma Discharge and when you add more from +(Z^k)-(Z/Z^k) the shape is changing to what we see in the end of the universe as a young stellar objects.
I understand that because the speed of light is on the left side, led me to think that the speed of light is something that comes from the landscape. I think that means that life produces what we call the speed of light. I believe these two equations: ∫C=E/M and f(z)=(Z^k)-(Z/Z^k) are consistent Someone has already told me they are consistent, but let's just say I'm still not sure. if you can help with that this will be great.
In this model the results are: that our universe is made up of two motionless vector lines.
I understand that this model is difficult to swallow for several reasons, one reason being that I am not writing academically, nor are the fixed bridges that need to be crossed. One good thing I can say about this model is that it is really simple, and simple things are usually right.
And although I say it this way, I remain agnostic about the correctness of the model.
There have been many times that I have wanted to know already that the model is completely wrong and continue with my life. In the situation that I am in, I can only say that further investigation needs to take place. And I'm not the right person to do it because I don't even know math. I just translated the operator into language, and used logic. As I wrote before I don't even know for sure with the consistency of the equations. The geometry of the equations is very similar to the phenomena we see throughout the universe from the smallest to the most distant. The EU calls this form Birkeland currents and when there is plasma then the plasma shows this shape. And basically everything we look at in slow motion, but it's not just there,it is in the symmetry of life, the electron movement, and planets seeing this symmetry, it's the form of what the EU calls plasma discharge, that geometry is everywhere. And even strangely in antiquity as well. I am happy for any help I can get. Basically I have some predictions for example the shape of a star in slow motion. Another simple way to make software as a pretty simple principle and see what shape it takes.
your response is very important to me.
Sorry for the imprisoned length
LOve and Light